Week 4
IN THIS LESSON
-
Only read:
Executive Summary and Introduction (p. 3-7)
Chapter on Policy Recommendations (p. 16-29)
Conclusion (p. 30)
Contextualises the progression of capabilities within the EU and proposes key recommendations, including strategic allocation of EU compute resources, extension of regulatory frameworks, and international cooperation to effectively address key challenges.
-
Europe faces significant challenges in the generative AI economy, lagging behind the US by 45-70% in adoption. There is a need for strategic investments in workforce reskilling, talent retention, and infrastructure development to capture AI's potential.
-
Focus on:
Overview (p. 1-3)
Part 1 (p. 4-11)
Conclusion (p. 23-24)
The EU's AI Continent Action Plan outlines bold actions to make Europe a global AI leader through five key pillars: building large-scale computing infrastructure including AI Factories and Gigafactories, enhancing data access through a Data Union Strategy, accelerating AI adoption in strategic sectors via the Apply AI Strategy, strengthening AI skills and talent, and fostering regulatory compliance while maintaining the EU's distinctive approach of trustworthy, human-centric AI aligned with democratic values.
-
The EU's AI Continent Action Plan has challenges in achieving true technological independence from the US and other suppliers despite increased investments and strategic initiatives.
-
The European Commission received an overwhelming response of 76 expressions of interest from 16 Member States for establishing AI Gigafactories across 60 sites, exceeding expectations and demonstrating high momentum for AI development in Europe.
-
How Europe might want to build sovereign AI capabilities while maintaining strategic influence.
-
The article argues that the EU's EuroStack initiative can create a "third way" that serves European interests while fostering global cooperation and maintaining EU leadership in digital rights.
-
Read only the Executive summary
As Europe’s nascent industrial policy on AI gains steady momentum, potentially allocating significant public and private funds and shaping regulatory actions, we need public scrutiny and debate to assess these initiatives critically. That’s where this report intervenes: to ask hard questions about the resource allocation in these nascent strategies and the process by which priorities will be decided; and, most fundamentally, to examine the premises underlying this vision.
